By Kathryn Benson, MIRHR
Senior Human Resources Consultant, HR Options
As in most disputes between employees and managers, there are
always two sides to the story. Often a manager sees a poorly performing
employee and the gut instinct is to terminate before things get worse. On the
employee side, the employee may feel misunderstood and unsupported by the
manager, which leads to accusations of "setting the employee up to
fail". One underlying cause of friction that is becoming more prevalent,
as well as a liability for employers in terminations, is the issue of accommodating
for Family Status under the provincial Human Rights Legislation.
In a recent situation, a manager asked an employee to come back
to work early from maternity leave to help out when they were short staffed.
She didn't want to originally, but finally agreed to a reduced schedule because
the employer needed her. After being back for only a few weeks, the manager
terminated her providing only the minimum notice under the Employment Standards
Act (ESA) because he was not happy with her performance and the fact she could
not fulfil more hours. The employee accused the manager of discrimination under
the Human Rights Code based on Family Status. She felt she was discriminated
against for going on maternity leave, and then having to balance parental
duties with her work shifts.
Some might say that the fact that the employee agreed to come
back to work by choice and then was terminated, with ESA minimum notice, seems
on the surface to have been legitimate (i.e. notice of termination was provided). However, whenever there
are extenuating circumstances, the case for providing above minimum notice
regulations may exist. Specifically in this case, because of her perception of
being discriminated against for having family obligations, the employee should
have clearly voiced her concerns, and the employer should have investigated the
situation. Investigating the human rights complaint does not stop the employer
from attempting to resolve the performance issues – this should have occurred as
well. If the investigation found that accommodation was needed under the protected
ground of Family Status, the employer should have worked with the employee on
appropriate accommodations, instead of proceeding with the minimum notice termination.
The bottom line is that employers cannot ignore requests to
accommodate for Family Status. However, that being said, accommodations are a
two-way street - the employee has to do their best to search for alternative options, as much as the employer has to provide flexible solutions (where it is
not a bona fide occupational requirement to work the job as provided). For example, if a child’s daycare closes early
and the employee's shift is not finished, an alternate daycare should be found
by the employee to accommodate his/her work hours. Accommodating for Family
Status doesn't mean the employer has to let the employee pick and choose
shifts, or pay for a nanny to be on-site, but the employer must accommodate in
good faith up to undue hardship. Also, an employer can certainly ask an
employee to demonstrate they have researched alternate options and are involved in providing suggestions that would be considered reasonable for the work environment.
One final point to keep in mind is that it doesn't matter how
poorly an employee is performing - if it's a Family Status accommodation
request, personal feeling towards the employee must be set aside, and a good
faith investigation should be completed. The end result may still be
termination, but if proper steps are taken, an employee-employer relationship
may be saved, or in the very least, the employer’s liability is minimized.
To review a recent case
which speaks directly to the above, see Federal Court of Appeal
Canada (Attorney
General) v. Johnstone
(released May 2, 2014).
For more information on how HR Options can assist you with human
resources services, and/or outsourced payroll and employment in the U.S. or
Canada, please contact Nunzio Presta at 1-866-859-4157 toll free or via email at npresta@hroptions.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment